Home / Common Problems / Mazda Mx 5

Mazda Mx 5 Problems & Known Issues

The most common Mazda Mx 5 problems ranked by severity — what to watch for, what it costs to fix, and what happens if you ignore it.

Generations

NB — Second Generation
1998–2005
1.6 16v, 1.6 VVT, 1.8 VVT, 1.8 VVT
NC — Third Generation
2005–2015
1.8 MZR, 2.0 MZR
ND — Fourth Generation
2015–2024
1.5 Skyactiv-G, 2.0 Skyactiv-G

Top issues to watch for

The most serious Mazda Mx 5 problems ranked by severity. We track 11 known issues — here are the ones you need to know about first.

Dangerous
Sill structural corrosion (NB)
NBBP-ZE, BP-4W1998–20050k–200k miles
The rear sills on NB MX-5s are prone to corrosion from the inside out, particularly where the hood frame drain channels allow water to collect. This affects the structural integrity of the passenger cell and is the most common MOT failure reason for this generation. The outer sill skin often appears solid while the inner structure is severely compromised. UK cars are particularly affected due to road salt and damp climate.
What happens if ignoredSevere sill corrosion compromises the structural rigidity of the passenger safety cell and will cause MOT failure. Professional sill replacement typically requires cutting out the entire rear section and welding in new metal. Cost varies dramatically depending on extent of damage but frequently exceeds the car's value on older examples.
Independent garage
£1,500–£3,500
Specialist
£2,000–£4,500
Parts only
£300–£800
Dangerous
Suspension mounting point corrosion (NB/NC)
NB, NCBP-ZE, BP-4W, LF-VE1998–20150k–200k miles
The front and rear suspension mounting points are susceptible to corrosion that can weaken the attachment points to dangerous levels. This particularly affects the front upper wishbone mounts on the inner wing and rear suspension mounting points in the boot area. MOT data shows this model fails at 62.6 times the fleet average for mounting point corrosion, making it one of the most common failure modes.
What happens if ignoredFailed mounting points can allow suspension components to detach, causing immediate loss of vehicle control and potential serious accident. The car should not be driven if mounting point integrity is suspect. Repair requires cutting out corroded metal and welding in reinforcement plates.
Independent garage
£800–£2,000
Specialist
£1,200–£2,500
Parts only
£200–£500
Major
Timing belt service (NB)
NBBP-ZE, BP-4W1998–20050k–80k miles
The BP-ZE and BP-4W engines use an interference timing belt system where belt failure causes valve-to-piston contact and expensive internal damage. Mazda specifies 80,000 mile or 8-year intervals but the belt must be replaced regardless of condition within this timeframe. This is scheduled maintenance rather than a fault, but failure to service the belt results in catastrophic engine damage.
What happens if ignoredBelt failure destroys valves, pistons, and cylinder head requiring complete engine rebuild typically costing £3000-5000. The car cannot be driven after belt failure. Prevention through scheduled replacement is far more cost-effective than repair after failure.
Independent garage
£350–£500
Specialist
£400–£600
Main dealer
£500–£750
Parts only
£80–£150
Major
Suspension joint and bush wear (all generations)
NB, NC, NDBP-ZE, BP-4W, LF-VE1998–202440k–120k miles
MX-5 suspension bushes and joints wear at significantly higher rates than average due to the car's sporting suspension setup and enthusiast driving patterns. MOT data shows failure rates of 78.3 times the fleet average, with particular problems in upper and lower wishbone bushes, anti-roll bar links, and ball joints. The rear upper arm bushes are especially prone to splitting.
What happens if ignoredWorn bushes affect handling precision and can cause dangerous instability at higher speeds. Severely worn ball joints may separate causing loss of steering control. Most components can be replaced individually but alignment is essential after suspension work.
Independent garage
£200–£600
Specialist
£250–£750
Main dealer
£350–£900
Parts only
£50–£200

7 more known issues tracked

Including wear items, electrical niggles, and generation-specific problems. Check a specific car to see which issues apply to its age and mileage.

Check a specific car →

MOT failure hotspots

Based on DVSA MOT test data. These are the items where the Mazda Mx 5 fails at a significantly higher rate than the average car.

Subframe bushes or mounts worn
Suspension · 60-80k miles
MOT failure rate: 165x the fleet average
Sample: 10,266 tests
Airbag fault
Seatbelts & Airbags · 100-120k miles
MOT failure rate: 120x the fleet average
Sample: 7,156 tests
Suspension ball joints worn
Suspension · 20-40k miles
MOT failure rate: 92x the fleet average
Sample: 54,260 tests
Seat mounting fault
Seatbelts & Airbags · 20-40k miles
MOT failure rate: 87x the fleet average
Sample: 12,879 tests
Anti-roll bar links worn
Suspension · 0-20k miles
MOT failure rate: 70x the fleet average
Sample: 4,723 tests
Structural corrosion
Bodywork · 40-60k miles
MOT failure rate: 54x the fleet average
Sample: 5,919 tests

Buying a Mazda Mx 5?

Check a specific car's service history to see if it's been looked after — franchised dealer records with dates, mileage, and work done.

Check service history

£6.99 · Full refund if no records found

Related

Mazda Mx 5 reliability FAQs

What are the most common problems with the Mazda Mx 5?

The Mazda Mx 5 has 11 known issues across 4 severity levels. The most serious are: Sill structural corrosion (NB), Suspension mounting point corrosion (NB/NC).

Is the Mazda Mx 5 reliable?

The Mazda Mx 5 has 2 dangerous and 3 major known issues. Most can be avoided with a thorough pre-purchase check and full service history.

How much does it cost to fix Mazda Mx 5 problems?

Repair costs range widely. The most significant issue (Sill structural corrosion (NB)) costs £1,500–£3,500 at an independent garage. Minor issues can be under £200. Always get a full inspection before buying.

Which Mazda Mx 5 generation is most reliable?

The ND (2015–2024) has the fewest dangerous issues (0). However, condition and service history matter more than generation — a well-maintained earlier car can be more reliable than a neglected newer one.